Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| intro_oled [2026/06/05 16:36] – [Structure types] yusufabdillah | intro_oled [2026/06/05 16:45] (current) – [Other topics] yusufabdillah | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
| - | The characteristic of this structure is that light is directed from the emissive layer **towards the anode** and the substrate: they have to be **transparent** in the physics meaning if the term (i.e. not interact with a wave, and hence not absorb light rays). Usually, the transparent electrode is made of **ITO (indium-tin oxide)** and the substrate is made of **glass**. | + | The characteristic of this structure is that light is directed from the emissive layer **towards the anode** and the substrate: they have to be **transparent** in the physical sense of the term (i.e. not interact with a wave, and hence not absorb light rays). Usually, the transparent electrode is made of **ITO (indium-tin oxide)** and the substrate is made of **glass**. |
| - | Because the emissive layer emits in all space direction, the cathode has to be made of a **reflective material** (e.g. silver) to redirect rays towards the anode. | + | Because the emissive layer emits light in all directions, the cathode has to be made of a **reflective material** (e.g. silver) to redirect rays towards the anode. |
| - | The main disadvantage of the bottom-emission structure is that light has to pass through the pixel control circuit (the TFT matrix in the case of an AMOLED) that cannot be fully transparent. This implies a lower quantity | + | The main disadvantage of the bottom-emission structure is that light has to pass through the pixel control circuit (the TFT matrix in the case of an AMOLED) that cannot be fully transparent. This implies a lower amount |
| <figure center |bottom_emission_OLED> | <figure center |bottom_emission_OLED> | ||
| Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
| - | In this structure, light is emitted from the emissive layer **towards the cathode**, it must therefore be transparent. Conversely, the **anode must be reflective** to redirect light towards the cathode. ITO is not a great fit for the cathode material due to technical constraints during the material deposition, and preferably a **thin-film silver** or **magnesium-silver alloys** is used. The cathode is however **semi-transparent** rather than transparent (some part of the incident rays are transmitted by the material and another part is reflected) which is not a problem if the material | + | In this structure, light is emitted from the emissive layer **towards the cathode**, it must therefore be transparent. Conversely, the **anode must be reflective** to redirect light towards the cathode. ITO is not a great fit for the cathode material due to technical constraints during the material deposition, and preferably a **thin-film silver** or **magnesium-silver alloys** is used. The cathode is however **semi-transparent** rather than transparent (some part of the incident rays are transmitted by the material and another part is reflected) which is not a problem if the material |
| <figure center |top_emission_OLED> | <figure center |top_emission_OLED> | ||
| Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
| - | This structure has **two transparent electrodes**: | + | This structure has **two transparent electrodes**: |
| Line 205: | Line 205: | ||
| - **AMOLED (Active-Matrix OLED)** | - **AMOLED (Active-Matrix OLED)** | ||
| - | **AMOLEDs** include complete layers of cathode, organic components and anode. The layers of anode consist of **TFT (thin film transistors)** in parallel to form a matrix, which helps in switching | + | **AMOLEDs** include complete layers of cathode, organic components, and anode. The layers of anode consist of **TFT (thin film transistors)** in parallel to form a matrix, which helps switch |
| [([Q. Liu and T. Zhang, ‘Comparison between AMOLED and Traditional Display Technology and Application of AMOLED’, SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap., vol. 53, no. S1, pp. 1018–1021, | [([Q. Liu and T. Zhang, ‘Comparison between AMOLED and Traditional Display Technology and Application of AMOLED’, SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap., vol. 53, no. S1, pp. 1018–1021, | ||
| Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
| **Types of rigidity: flexible vs. rigid OLED screens ** | **Types of rigidity: flexible vs. rigid OLED screens ** | ||
| - | Flexible OLED based products aren’t always bendable or foldable | + | Flexible OLED-based products aren’t always bendable or foldable |
| - | [(P. Samorì and V. Palermo, [Flexible Carbon-based Electronics](https:// | + | [(P. Samorì and V. Palermo, [Flexible Carbon-based Electronics](https:// |
| - | The difference in the manufacturing of flexible and rigid OLEDs remains | + | The difference in the manufacturing of flexible and rigid OLEDs lies in two processes steps: substrate and encapsulation ([[screen_manufacturing|check this page]] for more information). |